brazerzkidaisoccer.blogg.se

Parallels access vs desktop
Parallels access vs desktop






parallels access vs desktop parallels access vs desktop

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is most compared with TeamViewer, VMware Horizon View, Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, VMware Horizon 7 and Citrix Workspace, whereas Parallels Access is most compared with TeamViewer, Splashtop Remote Support, VNC Connect, LogMeIn Pro and Check Point Remote Access VPN. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parallels Access writes "Easy remote deployment, very stable and easy to scale". The top reviewer of Microsoft Remote Desktop Services writes "Easy to set up and reliable, but needs an additional control panel". Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is rated 8.0, while Parallels Access is rated 0.0. Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is ranked 3rd in Remote Access with 20 reviews while Parallels Access is ranked 20th in Remote Access with 1 review. More Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Cons → Microsoft should show where the problem is, I have to find it by myself." "The user interface needs improvement." "There could be some improvement in the integration of the solution." The feature should be available for all versions." "There are times I get disconnected from the service and when one or two attempts to establish a remote connection. However, it could be made easier to use for the end user, especially when it comes to activating it." "I would like to see a web-based interface, instead of client installation to refresh the UI through HTML." "Sometimes difficult to set up without the requirement for login credentials each time." "Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is only available for the professional version of the Windows operating system. It's a bit heavier than some solutions." "From the perspective of an IT professional, Microsoft Remote Desktop is very easy to use. "Microsoft Desktop Services is stable but it takes up a lot of resources in the CPU.








Parallels access vs desktop